Emissions Monitoring and Speed to Detection
Would You Rather Have Monthly Firetruck Inspections or a Fire Alarm System in Your Home?
The New Source Performance standard for crude oil and natural gas facilities (commonly known as OOOOb) is in effect. This regulation, which aims to sharply reduce emissions of methane and other VOCs from oil and natural gas operations, includes the methane Super-Emitter Program. Super emitters are methane emission events that emit more than 100 kg of methane per hour, and they represent a large portion of methane emissions across the oil and gas industry. Quick detection and action on these leaks can significantly reduce the overall methane emissions for an operator. Ultimately, the Super Emitter program drives operators to take immediate notice of irregular emission events and implement swift action.
In some respects, it’s like a home fire prevention system. When it comes to your home’s or business safety, would you prefer relying on monthly inspections, or having a fire alarm system installed in your home? This analogy highlights a crucial point: while periodic inspections, such as monthly Optical Gas Imaging (OGI) inspections, can identify issues large and small, they are not as quick as a continuous, real-time monitoring systems in identifying potentially catastrophic events. Just as a fire alarm provides immediate alerts, allowing for prompt action to prevent a disaster, the Soofie® system offers real-time emissions monitoring and instant notifications.
The Super Emitter Program: A Structured Response
The Super Emitter Program by the EPA provides a structured framework for addressing high-emission events. This program focuses on the rapid detection and reporting of significant methane leaks to mitigate environmental impact and maintain compliance with regulatory standards.
- Detection: Certified Third Parties are responsible for detecting super emitter events. They must notify the EPA within 15 days of detection to ensure timely action.
- Evaluation: Upon receiving a notification, the EPA evaluates the event. If the event passes the screening, the EPA notifies the owner or operator of the facility involved.
- Investigation: Once notified by the EPA, the owner or operator must initiate an investigation within five days to determine the cause of the emission event and implement necessary measures to stop the leak.
- Reporting & Corrective Action: The owner or operator has 15 days to submit a detailed report to the EPA, outlining the corrective actions taken to address the super emitter event.
- Notification: After the super emitter event ends, the owner or operator must notify the EPA to provide closure to the incident and ensure all corrective measures are in place.
For more detailed information, you can refer to the EPA's official documentation on the Super Emitter Program: https://www.epa.gov/compliance/super-emitter
How Super Emitter Enforced?
Enforcement of super emitter regulations involves several steps. Firstly, facilities identified as super emitters are placed on a compliance monitoring list. These facilities are required to report their emissions under Subpart W regulations. Failure to investigate and address super emitter events can lead to legal action, including decrees mandating compliance. The emissions data reported under Subpart W is crucial, as it directly impacts a facility's Waste Emission Charge (WEC). Being on this list and the resulting reporting obligations can have significant financial and operational implications for the facility.
Wait, what is the WEC? How does it work with Super Emitter Program and Subpart W?
The dynamic between Super Emitters, Subpart W, and the WEC is critical to understand. Companies are now required to report emissions events under Subpart W of the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program. These reported emissions are factored into a company's WEC calculations.
WEC-Eligible Sites: A site is considered WEC-eligible if it emits about 25,000 metric tons or more of CO2 equivalent, as determined by your Subpart W report. For facilities above or close to this threshold, large methane releases, like a super emitter event, could result in unexpected and potentially large waste emission charges.
This structured approach ensures that companies are held accountable for their emissions and are incentivized to minimize high-emission events to avoid substantial financial repercussions.
Companies are now required to report emissions events in Subpart W. And the emissions reported are calculated into a company’s WEC.
Emissions from Individual Assets Relative to WEC Threshold – 2022 Data
The 2022 data reveals an interesting trend in emissions from individual assets relative to the Waste Emission Charge (WEC) thresholds. Most individual assets are teetering close to being WEC neutral. However, one super emitter event can easily push a facility over its threshold, tipping the balance into significant financial penalties.
The accompanying graph illustrates this point vividly. On the left side of the chart, metric tons are plotted based on their methane intensity threshold. Each dot represents a WEC-eligible site and its position in relation to the methane intensity threshold. Sites below the threshold line are unlikely to face charges, while those above the line indicate potential issues. The majority of sites hover near the cutoff, incurring fines but not significant ones. However, the risk escalates dramatically with a single large super emitter event, easily pushing a facility above the threshold and into substantial financial penalties.
Super Emitter Events Aren't Uncommon
The map below illustrates data collected from all surveys conducted between 2019 and Fall 2021. This comprehensive survey data highlights that super emitters above 100 kg/hr are not uncommon across the surveyed areas. While larger super emitter events are less frequent, they are certainly not rare occurrences.
This map, sourced from the U.S. Census Bureau’s Geographic Products Management Branch (tiger@census.gov, Phone: 301-763-1128), vividly displays the distribution and frequency of super emitters emitting above the specified threshold. The color coding indicates the emission rates, ranging from less than 2 kg/hr (white) to over 1000 kg/hr (red).
The map further illustrates these findings, highlighting the distribution and frequency of super emitters emitting above the specified threshold. This data underscores the importance of continuous monitoring and rapid response to manage and mitigate the environmental impact of these significant emission sources.
Need to insert the dynamic between Super emiiter, Subpart W, and WEC.
Companies are now required to report emissions events in Subpart W. And the emissions reported are calculated into a companies WEC.
- Define what makes a site WEC-eligible (any site that emits about 25,000 mt is "WEC-eligible"
How Much Can It Cost You? What's the Financial Damage?
The financial implications of waste emission charges (WEC) are determined by two key factors: the size of the leak (magnitude) and length of leak (duration) of the emissions. As illustrated in the accompanying chart, the severity of the charge is directly correlated with the size and duration of the leak. Under the Super Emitter Program, failure to provide the EPA with precise start and stop times defaults to the last survey data. This means that even if the emission event lasted only a week, but the last survey was conducted 180 days ago, the potential financial penalty could amount to up to $400k. This raises important questions for consideration: How can facilities ensure they fall on the left side of this chart? And what measures can be implemented to prevent super emitter events altogether? These questions underscore the critical importance of rapid detection and response strategies in mitigating financial risks associated with emissions.
So, What Can You Do?
In response to the need for speed, companies can take proactive steps to enhance their emissions monitoring practices:
Increase LDAR Frequency: Implement more frequent Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) inspections to catch emissions events early and mitigate environmental impact.
Evaluate Engineering Options: Assess engineering solutions and leverage data analytics to identify opportunities for emission reduction and process optimization.
Improve Response Rates: Enhance response protocols to ensure rapid action in the event of emissions incidents, minimizing both the duration and severity of environmental impact.
How to Improve Your Response Rate?
To enhance response rates and minimize the impact of emissions events, consider the following strategies:
Shorten Event Duration:
Implement systems that shorten the duration of emissions events in real-time.
Deploy Real-Time Alerts:
Set up systems that notify operators immediately when significant leaks occur on-site, providing key information on location, size, and duration.
Leverage Continuous Monitoring:
Integrate continuous monitoring solutions to tie into parametric data, enabling precise control over emissions events.
Case Study: Soofie Success
In a real-world scenario, Soofie® detected emissions exceeding 90 kg/hr, alerting the customer for quick response. Had the customer waited for the next scheduled visit, the leak would have equated to powering 23 homes for a year or driving 40 cars for the same duration. (link: https://www.championx.com/products-and-solutions/emissions-technologies/a-soofie-success-story/)
Conclusion: Accelerating Towards a Sustainable Future
The race against emissions requires swift action and proactive monitoring. By embracing real-time monitoring technologies and optimizing response protocols, companies can not only mitigate financial risks but also demonstrate a commitment to environmental stewardship and regulatory compliance.
Our Solutions
Explore the solutions and services ChampionX offers.
Resource Library
Filter through our latest product literature to find case histories, product brochures, news, and more.
